Catalog

confident hallucination

caught bytypecheck and build, not reading — the name is plausible precisely because it is the name the library SHOULD have had

the rule it writesgates include typecheck and build, never lint alone

the test was written after

caught bywriting the failing test FIRST and watching it go red — a test authored against the code it tests can only agree with it

the rule it writesa bug fix starts with a test that reproduces it, red before green

collateral change

caught byrunning the WHOLE gate rather than the tests near the change — the damage is never in the file you were looking at

the rule it writesgates run on everything, not on what changed

a claim with no evidence

caught byreading the gate output instead of the summary; if no command ran, nothing passed

the rule it writesdone means a gate said so, never that the model said so

documentation drift

caught byreview that reads the comment AGAINST the code — the two agreeing is the thing being checked, not the code alone

the rule it writeschanging a behaviour changes the sentence that describes it

agreement without compliance

caught byreading the diff rather than the summary — the restatement is generated from your words, so it always agrees with them

the rule it writesacceptance reads the diff, never the conclusion